From 708c3de9b82c04d98cc9fa2b2706ea0e7deb6d80 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: robertturner <143536791+robertdhayanturner@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 16:52:05 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Update retrieval_augmented_generation_eval.md

remove extra "evaluation" from intro part
---
 docs/use_cases/retrieval_augmented_generation_eval.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/docs/use_cases/retrieval_augmented_generation_eval.md b/docs/use_cases/retrieval_augmented_generation_eval.md
index 221b2d1bd..a74e38820 100644
--- a/docs/use_cases/retrieval_augmented_generation_eval.md
+++ b/docs/use_cases/retrieval_augmented_generation_eval.md
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 # Evaluating Retrieval Augmented Generation - a framework for assessment
 
-*In this first article of a three-part (monthly) series, we introduce RAG evaluation, outline its challenges, propose an effective evaluation framework, and provide a rough overview of the various evaluation tools and approaches you can use to evaluate your RAG application.*
+*In this first article of a three-part (monthly) series, we introduce RAG evaluation, outline its challenges, propose an effective evaluation framework, and provide a rough overview of the various tools and approaches you can use to evaluate your RAG application.*
 
 ## Why evaluate RAG?