2023-03-02 Community Call #868
Replies: 4 comments 1 reply
-
Failing CIDuring review, we only test on MOAB 5.3.0, but upon merge we test on MOAB Minimum fix: change those tests to be optional and point badge at 5.3.0 test. Ideal fix: fix MOAB/DAGMC integration for newest versions. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Mapping DAGMC GeneralizationVisit from UKAEA to ANL resulted in some planning ideas for how to generalize different elements of the DAGMC interface to allow for different implementations. @pshriwise and @helen-brooks may share some details at a later date. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Spring 2023 Documentation ReviewInspired by @pshriwise's rallying cry for documentation improvements, the first PR (#869) has been submitted, but needs a little clean up still. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
MPI error with DAGMC Tet-Mesh talliesDiscussion of error reported by @bohmt (#865). Explored where data is passed back and forth between MCNP6 Fortran and DAGMC C++. No immediate insights and probably a problem that will be challenging to track down. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Participating:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions