You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the feature in detail (code, mocks, or screenshots encouraged)
Currently, when you add elements within a PaneGroup that are not Pane components, the handle drifts while resizing.
Example:
<Resizable.PaneGroup>
<div> Element of a fixed size </div>
<Resizable.Pane />
<Resizable.Handle />
<Resizable.Pane />
</Resizable.PaneGroup>
Attempted Workaround:
I tried adding a "collapsed" element with a dummy handle as a workaround, but as you can only define the size of Panes as a percentage of the total available space, resizing the PaneGroup itself lead to unwanted resizing of the "static" element.
Desired Solution:
Having either another component, or a prop to define a static Pane or a way of defining the size of a collapsed Pane in px or rem would solve this.
What type of pull request would this be?
None
Provide relevant links or additional information.
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the feature in detail (code, mocks, or screenshots encouraged)
Currently, when you add elements within a PaneGroup that are not Pane components, the handle drifts while resizing.
Example:
Attempted Workaround:
I tried adding a "collapsed" element with a dummy handle as a workaround, but as you can only define the size of Panes as a percentage of the total available space, resizing the PaneGroup itself lead to unwanted resizing of the "static" element.
Desired Solution:
Having either another component, or a prop to define a static Pane or a way of defining the size of a collapsed Pane in px or rem would solve this.
What type of pull request would this be?
None
Provide relevant links or additional information.
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: