Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 12, 2023. It is now read-only.

Split to a single calendar per room #26

Open
DeD1rk opened this issue Sep 7, 2021 · 4 comments
Open

Split to a single calendar per room #26

DeD1rk opened this issue Sep 7, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@DeD1rk
Copy link
Member

DeD1rk commented Sep 7, 2021

The current view with all reservations side by side is unreadable even on medium screens. I think having 3 separate calendars would help with this (#5) and at the same time implement #25.

@se-bastiaan
Copy link

An alternative proposed by Thomas that would also help is giving the rooms different colours

@DeD1rk
Copy link
Member Author

DeD1rk commented Sep 15, 2021

With the current number of spots I don't think coloring by itself is a solution. On mobile the system is now completely unusable as many reservations are only a few pixels wide...image

Though I suppose this could be mitigated somewhat by making the width be shared evenly over concurrent reservations.

@JobDoesburg
Copy link
Collaborator

Because we probably don't need this whole system anymore in 10 days, I think we won't fix this anymore

@se-bastiaan
Copy link

I was looking at implementing the timeline view from the scheduler package, but that didn't work easy so gave up

Gulianrdgd pushed a commit to Gulianrdgd/sagexit that referenced this issue Dec 23, 2021
….md and fixed poetry lock by updating xmlsec
Gulianrdgd pushed a commit to Gulianrdgd/sagexit that referenced this issue Dec 23, 2021
….md and fixed poetry lock by updating xmlsec
JobDoesburg pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 29, 2021
* Fix for issue #26, added setting up development to the README.md and fixed poetry lock by updating xmlsec

* Fix for issue #26, added setting up development to the README.md and fixed poetry lock by updating xmlsec

* disabled dragging if filter is not on that room. Also fixed styling of the filter

Co-authored-by: Julian van der Horst <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants