You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
You should evaluate DeepFace model on LFW data set and share its accuracy on read me page. The original DeepFace study got 97.35% accuracy but your model trained on different data set. It might have different accuracy level.
Similarly, David Sandberg reimplemented Google FaceNet model and evaluate his model on LFW data set as well. He got 0.99650+-0.00252 accuracy whereas original Google FaceNet study got 99.63%.
This will show how your model robust indeed.
Regards.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
You should evaluate DeepFace model on LFW data set and share its accuracy on read me page. The original DeepFace study got 97.35% accuracy but your model trained on different data set. It might have different accuracy level.
Similarly, David Sandberg reimplemented Google FaceNet model and evaluate his model on LFW data set as well. He got 0.99650+-0.00252 accuracy whereas original Google FaceNet study got 99.63%.
This will show how your model robust indeed.
Regards.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: