What is the future of this project?

[pykong]

@syrusakbary Thanks for putting in the hard work of bringing Jade to Python.

It would be a shame if this highly useful library just vanishes due to lack of maintenance.
While you eventually prioritize other projects now, other users are still showing interest in pyjade and are contributing. (As of writing this I am counting 83 open issue and 20 open PRs.)

While a mere fork of pyjade like @kakulukia's pypugjs offers one way forward, it comes with the usual downside of forks such as dilution of attention.

Hence, I would welcome if we could move pyjade forward instead, letting it remain the foremost python implementation of jade/pug.

Could you therefore maybe suggest a model of participation in this project which would allow others to participate in this project in lieu of your own intervention?