Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Workable samples #12

Closed
cmcau opened this issue Mar 1, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

Workable samples #12

cmcau opened this issue Mar 1, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@cmcau
Copy link

cmcau commented Mar 1, 2024

Is it possible to get some sample settings to see how it works?

Examples:

  • specified project only
  • all project/s only
  • specified workbook/s
  • EVERYTHING that's available

I'm hoping someone can help me, but I'm happy to contribute when I can get these few items working.

@rbanderton rbanderton added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Mar 1, 2024
@rbanderton
Copy link
Collaborator

By default the SDK moves all content that is available, so our getting started sample focuses on that.

For the other use cases, you'll need filters of one sort or another. We have a couple sample filters to get started and that should be easily adaptable to the "specified workbooks" case, though for now if you're using Python you'll need to see the Python hooks documentation to express those in Python, as we currently only have C# sample filters. How those filters look is going to depend on your comparison criteria, though. Do you want simple name comparison, does project path come in to play, etc.

For "specified projects" we have an explanation on how to implement filters for that.

For "all projects only" it would just be filters that return false on every item of the content types you don't want to migrate. Our test application has examples of that.

Hope that helps. Happy to discuss documentation improvements that would make that easier to find/understand.

@cmcau
Copy link
Author

cmcau commented Mar 1, 2024

Thanks :) I was wanting to take it slowly and test (that's a management request ;) ) I'm happy with the "all available content" approach. As soon as I get it working I can judge from there :)

@rbanderton
Copy link
Collaborator

Closing due to inactivity.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants