Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
96 lines (76 loc) · 5.06 KB

u2f_migration.md

File metadata and controls

96 lines (76 loc) · 5.06 KB
Raw

Migrating from U2F to WebAuthn

The Chromium team recommends application developers to switch from the U2F API to the WebAuthn API. This document describes how a Ruby application using the u2f gem by Castle can migrate existing credentials so that their users do not experience interruption or need to re-register their security keys.

Note that the migration is one-way: credentials registered using WebAuthn cannot be made compatible with the U2F API. It is recommended to successfully migrate authorization flows before migrating registration flows.

Migrate registered U2F credentials

Assuming you have a registered credential per the u2f gem readme, base64 urlsafe encoded in a database:

# This domain will be used in all code examples. It's a single-facet app but a multi-facet AppID
# (e.g. https://example.com/app-id.json) will work as well.
domain = URI("https://login.example.com")

u2f_registration = U2F::U2F.new(domain.to_s).register!(u2f_challenge, u2f_register_response)
# => #<U2F::Registration:0x00007fd62f43d688
#  @certificate=
#   "MIIBCzCBsgIBATAKBggqhkjOPQQDAjASMRAwDgYDVQQDDAdVMkZUZXN0MB4XDTE5MDUzMDE3MjIwM1oXDTIwMDUyOTE3MjIwM1owEjEQMA4GA1UEAwwHVTJGVGVzdDBZMBMGByqGSM49AgEGCCqGSM49AwEHA0IABBMKpejumzlH6NxWIx2Ol+EManS9oX5nguG4RT43rZNkyn/zGjdJEhXksN5zT34rLZgFheBgkDGJCdtTPlhVK10wCgYIKoZIzj0EAwIDSAAwRQIhALYxFcROCeifWpv5+wNZIiaO/bGQg8rFBHCw3aHgehdZAiBJ3xFmQh7+Gjxt6CeAcY/k/VVAYu2vP4sUqXnCQFgJUA==",
#  @key_handle="mbVMRTgzST5xLumckGztJ9VFW6veObfNIYWSn3sTqIY",
#  @public_key="BOJQXlFg+ZfZKm48FNq2Ye5vSwOscE1i7YsGRSIjIe3GI0OXrSBDADDn0dQlz2iDzZ7LvCwiHz72U1qhVas3vus=">

The U2fMigrator class quacks like WebAuthn::AuthenticatorAttestationResponse and can be used similarly as documented in the registration verification phase. Of course a verify instance method is not implemented, as there is no real interaction with an authenticator.

The migrator can be used to convert credentials in real time during authentication while keeping them stored in the U2F format, and in a backfill task to store credentials in the new format, depending on how you are approaching your migration.

require "webauthn/u2f_migrator"

migrated_credential = WebAuthn::U2fMigrator.new(
  app_id: domain,
  certificate: u2f_registration.certificate,
  key_handle: u2f_registration.key_handle,
  public_key: u2f_registration.public_key,
  counter: u2f_registration.counter
)
migrated_credential.credential.id
# => "\x99\xB5LE83I>q.\xE9\x9C\x90l\xED'\xD5E[\xAB\xDE9\xB7\xCD!\x85\x92\x9F{\x13\xA8\x86"
migrated_credential.credential.public_key
# => "\xA5\x03& \x01!X \xE2P^Q`\xF9\x97\xD9*n<\x14\xDA\xB6a\xEEoK\x03\xACpMb\xED\x8B\x06E\"#!\xED\xC6\x01\x02\"X #C\x97\xAD C\x000\xE7\xD1\xD4%\xCFh\x83\xCD\x9E\xCB\xBC,\"\x1F>\xF6SZ\xA1U\xAB7\xBE\xEB"
migrated_credential.authenticator_data.sign_count
# => 41

Authenticate migrated U2F credentials

Following the documentation on the authentication initiation, you need to specify the FIDO AppID extension for U2F migratedq credentials. The WebAuthn standard explains:

The FIDO APIs use an alternative identifier for Relying Parties called an AppID, and any credentials created using those APIs will be scoped to that identifier. Without this extension, they would need to be re-registered in order to be scoped to an RP ID.

For the earlier given example domain this means:

  • FIDO AppID: https://login.example.com
  • Valid RP IDs: login.example.com (default) and example.com
credential_request_options = WebAuthn.credential_request_options
credential_request_options[:extensions] = { appid: domain.to_s }

On the frontend, in the resolved value from navigator.credentials.get({ "publicKey": credentialRequestOptions }) add a call to getClientExtensionResults() and send its result to your backend alongside the id/rawId and response values. If the authenticator used the AppID extension, the returned value will contain { "appid": true }. In the example below, we use clientExtensionResults.

During authentication verification phase, you must pass either the original AppID or the RP ID as the rp_id argument:

If true, the AppID was used and thus, when verifying an assertion, the Relying Party MUST expect the rpIdHash to be the hash of the AppID, not the RP ID.

assertion_response = WebAuthn::AuthenticatorAssertionResponse.new(
  credential_id: params[:id],
  authenticator_data: params[:response][:authenticatorData],
  client_data_json: params[:response][:clientDataJSON],
  signature: params[:response][:signature],
)

assertion_response.verify(
  expected_challenge,
  allowed_credentials: [credential],
  rp_id: params[:clientExtensionResults][:appid] ? domain.to_s : domain.host,
)