Formatting in UG

[tangzhenen]

maybe adding boxes could make it more tidy

[soc-se-bot]

Team's Response

User stories are not present in User Guide.

The 'Original' Bug

[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]

Unclear table formatting for summary of commands in UG

Note from the teaching team: This bug was reported during the Part II (Evaluating Documents) stage of the PE. You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.

---

It was not very clear which syntax and parameters belonged to which commands. Perhaps it would be better to add table borders?

---

_{[original: nus-cs2113-AY2324S1/pe-interim#36] [original labels: severity.Low type.DocumentationBug]}

Their Response to the 'Original' Bug

[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]

Cosmetic issue.

Items for the Tester to Verify

❓ Issue duplicate status

Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)

• I disagree

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]

---

❓ Issue severity

Team chose [severity.VeryLow]
Originally [severity.Low]

• I disagree

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]

---