Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
78 lines (60 loc) · 2.03 KB

TEP010_improve_documentation.rst

File metadata and controls

78 lines (60 loc) · 2.03 KB

TEP009: Improve Documentation

Status

Discussion

Responsible

@unoebauer, @wkerzendorf

Branches and Pull requests

None

Description

The documentation is incomplete, many is incomplete, many important aspects of TARDIS are missing. To improve the TARDIS manual and to make it easier for new users to understand and use this program, the following aspects should be either better documented or their existing description expanded:

  • reflecting inner boundary option
  • adiabatic losses: illustrate and explain why the sum of backscattered and escaping luminosity is smaller than the injected one
  • atom data sources: where do for example the zeta values come from
  • ionization/excitation treatments: what are main different treatments, what is their physical meaning and who proposed them
  • number of shells set up: there is always in the specific structure mode a "dummy" photospheric shell
  • number of iterations set up: make clear that the last spectral run always counts as one iteration, i.e.
  • git clean -dfx, git clean -dfxn: when and why to use these commands
  • config validator
  • configuration options: what are the different options that Tardis recognises

All these points should find their way into a coherent full documentation. Currently, the documentation has the following structure.

  • Using Tardis * Installation * Quickstart Guide * Ejecta Model Setup * TARDIS Configuration * Examples * Credit & Publication Policies
  • Looking under the hood * Physics behind TARDIS * Monte Carlo Primer
  • Developing Tardis * Reporting Issues * How to contribute * Running tests
  • References * TARDIS Papers and useful references

Whether this structure is appropriate and if it should be changed should be discussed by the collaboration here.

Implementation

Will be specified once the (potential) new structure of the documentation has been decided.

Backward compatibility

N/A

Alternatives

None