Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 6, 2020. It is now read-only.

Add Perceptual Speed Index to Required Metrics #64

Open
kristoferbaxter opened this issue Jun 11, 2017 · 5 comments
Open

Add Perceptual Speed Index to Required Metrics #64

kristoferbaxter opened this issue Jun 11, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@kristoferbaxter
Copy link
Collaborator

@addyosmani and @housseindjirdeh – We should consider adding PSI to the required metrics with a link explaining what it is.

Frequently implementations can trade-off faster "boot" times for degraded PSI and vice-versa. Since the goal is to understand the implementations (while we work on standardization of features), this metric could help visitors gain more insight into the motivations of each implementation.

@housseindjirdeh
Copy link
Collaborator

🙌 I think that's a great idea, will be more then happy to include it in the site with a snippet/link explaining what it is.

@addyosmani
Copy link
Member

@kristoferbaxter @housseindjirdeh I'm more than happy for us to include PSI in the required metrics.

Link wise, we've got a brief explainer here: https://developers.google.com/web/tools/lighthouse/audits/speed-index and https://www.instartlogic.com/blog/perceptual-speed-index-psi-measuring-above-fold-visual-performance-web-pages


At some point (no rush) we might find value in exploring an automated pipeline for periodically re-running our WebPageTest reports for each app and extracting the relevant scores we want to track from the WPT API. I believe what's included from the Lighthouse report can also be extracted from there, but we can chat more about whether this is something we want to do at a later point 😄

@housseindjirdeh
Copy link
Collaborator

@addyosmani I think that's a great idea and I've been thinking that we may definitely want to automate this sometime. Opened #71 to track it :)

@kristoferbaxter
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I'll see about collecting a new set of data including PSI for a branch.

@addyosmani
Copy link
Member

Perfect. Thanks both!

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants