Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LINCS warning #14

Open
cherpradyumnsharma opened this issue Oct 25, 2018 · 3 comments
Open

LINCS warning #14

cherpradyumnsharma opened this issue Oct 25, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@cherpradyumnsharma
Copy link

Hi
I used your script to get parameters for some small molecules. But when i run these simulations on gromacs I get lot of LINCS warning for these simulations for timestep greater than 10 femtoseconds. Something like

##############################################
Step 40342, time 806.84 (ps) LINCS WARNING
relative constraint deviation after LINCS:
rms 0.003365, max 0.006212 (between atoms 2 and 5)
bonds that rotated more than 30 degrees:
atom 1 atom 2 angle previous, current, constraint length
1 2 31.0 0.2399 0.2399 0.2400

#################################################
My mdp file

integrator = md
tinit = 0.0
dt = 0.02
nsteps = 500000

nstlog = 1000
nstenergy = 1000
nstxout-compressed = 1000
compressed-x-precision = 100

cutoff-scheme = Verlet
nstlist = 20
ns_type = grid
pbc = xyz
verlet-buffer-tolerance = 0.005

epsilon_r = 15
coulombtype = reaction-field
rcoulomb = 1.1
vdw_type = cutoff
vdw-modifier = Potential-shift-verlet
rvdw = 1.1

tcoupl = v-rescale
tc-grps = System
tau_t = 1.0
ref_t = 303.15

; Pressure coupling:
Pcoupl = berendsen
Pcoupltype = semiisotropic
tau_p = 12
compressibility = 3e-4 3e-4
ref_p = 1.0 1.0

; GENERATE VELOCITIES FOR STARTUP RUN:
gen_vel = no

refcoord_scaling = all

@tbereau
Copy link
Owner

tbereau commented Oct 30, 2018

Hard to tell without information about the molecule and its CG representation, but I guess it's due to intramolecular interactions. Check if you have lots of rings, creating lots of constraints. In that case you may want to replace some of them with virtual sites. Otherwise look out for too many dihedrals in the molecule (maybe some redundancies?).

@cherpradyumnsharma
Copy link
Author

cherpradyumnsharma commented Oct 30, 2018 via email

@tbereau
Copy link
Owner

tbereau commented Nov 1, 2018

See my last message, hopefully this gives you some clues to fix the force field.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants