Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider taking advantage of @mustuse? #5

Open
AndrejMitrovic opened this issue Jul 2, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Consider taking advantage of @mustuse? #5

AndrejMitrovic opened this issue Jul 2, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@AndrejMitrovic
Copy link

The @mustuse attribute was implemented in DIP 1038.

I think it would be really nice to combine this with Expected in order to force client code to always handle return values of functions which can fail, in other words when their return type is Expected.

But this could also be a breaking change for the library.

Perhaps we could make this attribute optional or maybe introduce another type with this attribute which internally contains Expected? I can't think of a good way to make this look neat.

Curious about your thoughts.

And I wanted to say this is a great library and it's come really handy for me. Thanks for all your hard work!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant