Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Define a basic SLA for the hub #83

Open
bobcatfish opened this issue Sep 15, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Define a basic SLA for the hub #83

bobcatfish opened this issue Sep 15, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/frozen

Comments

@bobcatfish
Copy link

bobcatfish commented Sep 15, 2020

Feature request

In #82 we are creating a tool to at least notify us if the hub is down, but what is less clear is what it means when it is down and how urgent it is to fix it. For example, is it so important it be up that we want folks to be on call outside of working hours?

We discussed this a bit in the hub working group and in the productivity working group, and one interesting point is that as long as the hub isn't actually hosting Tasks/Pipelines (and it isn't - just referring ppl to git, and probably eventually to an OCI registry) then the hub going down won't actually break anyone; it just makes it harder to discover Tasks.

Proposal initial SLA: we will make sure the hub is up during build cop working hours, which will vary depending on who is build cop, and will only be Monday-Friday and not include holidays.

However, a counterpoint: if folks try to visit the hub and it is down, this might give them a negative impression of the project?

Use case

As a user of Tekton, I try to visit the hub on the weekend, and find that it is down. Is it acceptable for me to wait until Monday for it to be up?

@bobcatfish bobcatfish added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Sep 15, 2020
@vdemeester
Copy link
Member

This is a requirement for being able to mark the Hub as GA (aka not hub-preview anymore).

@tekton-robot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale with a justification.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close with a justification.
If this issue should be exempted, mark the issue as frozen with /lifecycle frozen with a justification.

/lifecycle stale

Send feedback to tektoncd/plumbing.

@bobcatfish
Copy link
Author

Based on @vdemeester 's comment about being a GA requirement:

/lifecycle frozen

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/frozen
Projects
Status: Todo
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants