Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Сlosing Jira issues if host no longer available #279

Open
zaa0777 opened this issue Jul 3, 2024 · 6 comments
Open

Сlosing Jira issues if host no longer available #279

zaa0777 opened this issue Jul 3, 2024 · 6 comments
Labels
backlog enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@zaa0777
Copy link

zaa0777 commented Jul 3, 2024

If for some reason the host is removed from tenable(sc) and information about active vulnerabilities is deleted. For example, a host is taken out of service and tenable no longer scan it, and after some time the results for this host are deleted automatically or manually from tenable, but we still have open issues in Jira.

@SteveMcGrath SteveMcGrath added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 9, 2024
@SteveMcGrath
Copy link
Collaborator

are the findings not transitioning to patched? w/in SC? is this a universal repo, or something else and what?

@zaa0777
Copy link
Author

zaa0777 commented Jul 9, 2024

This is a regular repository In SC.
I specifically deleted the hosts from the tenable repository, then started the sync again, but the issues with vulns were not closed.
When we delete a hosts from the repository, all the vulnerabilities that were just simply deleted and do not become mitigated.

@SteveMcGrath
Copy link
Collaborator

how are you deleting these assets?

@zaa0777
Copy link
Author

zaa0777 commented Jul 9, 2024

by importing cleanup file(Clean_Up_IPs_Reference) to tenable scan

@SteveMcGrath
Copy link
Collaborator

I got confirmation from our engineering team that SC wont necessarially mark those deleted findings as "patched". We can add a "resolve after X days" feature into the integration, however I'll have to investigate how to best accomplish this as it may require a bit of effort.

@SteveMcGrath
Copy link
Collaborator

in order to support this, it would require some refactoring of the mapping database to handle auto-closing. just note that this may take a bit, but still working on it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backlog enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants