Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Could provide interface of tensorflow old api rather than use estimator ? #31

Open
svjack opened this issue Nov 23, 2018 · 4 comments
Open
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested

Comments

@svjack
Copy link

svjack commented Nov 23, 2018

I can understand the motivation of use estimator api to
standardize the model construct and train methods in configuration,
But It may be complicated to debug with estimator api.

@cweill
Copy link
Contributor

cweill commented Nov 26, 2018

Can you please give an example of what you would prefer the API to look like? Perhaps the new adanet.AutoEnsembleEstimator may be a better API for your needs? I'm considering a simpler Keras-base API as well. But other options are welcome.

@cweill cweill added enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested labels Nov 26, 2018
@bhack
Copy link

bhack commented Nov 26, 2018

@cweill
Copy link
Contributor

cweill commented Nov 27, 2018

My understanding is tf.Estimator will continue to be the recommended way to train and serve models in TF 2.0.

@svjack
Copy link
Author

svjack commented Nov 27, 2018

My understanding is tf.Estimator will continue to be the recommended way to train and serve models in TF 2.0.

yes, for the compatibility conveyed by canned

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants