Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bucket_endpoint is not exposed in SCC module #127

Closed
ocofaigh opened this issue Jul 16, 2024 · 9 comments
Closed

bucket_endpoint is not exposed in SCC module #127

ocofaigh opened this issue Jul 16, 2024 · 9 comments
Assignees

Comments

@ocofaigh
Copy link
Member

ibm_scc_instance_settings seems to have a bucket_endpoint option that we are not using in the module.

The provider documentation is terrible here, but I'm assuming that if not value passed, its defaulting to public endpoint? Can we find this out - we may need to expose the ability for users to override the endpoint if they have public endpoint disabled for buckets.

@kierramarie
Copy link

Looking into what the default endpoint is

@kierramarie kierramarie self-assigned this Jul 17, 2024
@kierramarie
Copy link

instance_settings.object_storage.bucket_endpoint is an empty string by default. "bucket_endpoint" = ""

@kierramarie
Copy link

@ocofaigh do you want to expose it?

@ocofaigh
Copy link
Member Author

@kierramarie do what endpoint is used to communicate with the COS bucket if its not specified? public, private, direct?

@kierramarie
Copy link

@ocofaigh it looks like the default is public

@ocofaigh
Copy link
Member Author

@kierramarie yea lets expose it as optional - make sure to specify in the description that is not passed, it defaults to use public endpoint

@ocofaigh
Copy link
Member Author

This will then have to be backported to the SCC DA

@kierramarie
Copy link

Will do.

@ocofaigh
Copy link
Member Author

Seems its an issue with the docs, which is already being tracked here -> IBM-Cloud/terraform-provider-ibm#5110

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants