Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Provide a docker image that supports arm64v8 architecture #212

Open
jimpanzeeee opened this issue Nov 23, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Provide a docker image that supports arm64v8 architecture #212

jimpanzeeee opened this issue Nov 23, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@jimpanzeeee
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Camouflage is awesome. We have been using it to mock calls between the microservices and 3rd part APIs that make up our backend. We are including it in the docker-compose.yaml files for our repositories so it's easy for developers to spin-up a microservice locally. One problem we have though is several of our developers use Macs with M1 or M2 chips which have an ARM64 architecture and images that don't support the arm64v8 architecture severely slow down their build times on M1 and M2 Macs (this is common complaint if you look into it).

Describe the solution you'd like
Provide a docker image that supports arm64v8 architecture
https://www.docker.com/blog/multi-arch-build-and-images-the-simple-way/

Describe alternatives you've considered
Switching to other computers for these developers isn't really an option as they are company provided.

Thanks you for your consideration in looking into this request.

@shubhendumadhukar
Copy link
Contributor

@jimorey,

Could you please test the latest docker image shubhendumadhukar/camouflage:latest or docker pull shubhendumadhukar/camouflage:0.12.0, if that helps?

@shubhendumadhukar shubhendumadhukar moved this from To do to In Progress in Camouflage Issue Tracker Nov 24, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Status: In Progress
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants