-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tool "ray optic simulation" to model the radiation density with different placements of the source #9
Comments
this is the configuration as suggested in the schematics, modeled with this json file: {"version":2,"objs": |
This is the configuration with the light source in the middle: {"version":2,"objs": |
This is the configuration with the light source at half the pipe-radius (31.7mm), with this json file: {"version":2,"objs": |
This shows that the placement of the light source would be best in the middle of the pipe. The rule of thumb would be: the more in the middle the better. A compounding effect is that (if we assume laminar flow in the pipe) the particles in the middle travel faster then closer to the pipe's wall. so it turns out there wont be any laminar flow at all, it is going to be all turbulent. |
with raytracing software like Blender this can be modeled better. |
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/ray-optics-simulation/egamlemiidmmmcccadndbjjihkcfiobh
this is a chrome extension that allows to model our setup and lets you play around with the source placement in the pipe.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: