Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is there an active fork of this project? #1279

Open
Foosec opened this issue Nov 7, 2022 · 8 comments
Open

Is there an active fork of this project? #1279

Foosec opened this issue Nov 7, 2022 · 8 comments

Comments

@Foosec
Copy link

Foosec commented Nov 7, 2022

The creator seems to no longer be active.

@bluszcz
Copy link

bluszcz commented Jan 22, 2023

Good question, seems there is no compatibility with Qt6

@Foosec
Copy link
Author

Foosec commented Jan 23, 2023

Is anyone willing to create the next active fork of this? If nothing else we could get some PRs merged

@bluszcz
Copy link

bluszcz commented Jan 23, 2023

I have some experience in Qt and bunch of other languages, but quite new in Golang. However, happy to help.

@bluszcz
Copy link

bluszcz commented Jan 23, 2023

Well, I forked and starting to merge in develop branch. https://github.com/bluszcz/cutego/

@fizzywhizbang
Copy link

Well, I forked and starting to merge in develop branch. https://github.com/bluszcz/cutego/

Will keep an eye on your new project as I use this for a couple of projects and would like to migrate to Qt6

@icedream
Copy link

icedream commented Jun 15, 2023

@bluszcz The core subpackage seems to be broken in your fork but there's also no issue tracker to report it, so I'm mentioning it here.

imports github.com/bluszcz/cutego/core: C++ source files not allowed when not using cgo or SWIG: core.cpp

This seems to be failing because core.go is also in this directory and not doing an import "C" which Go does not like.

EDIT: Seems to be a result of the incomplete interop implementation that was in this repository getting merged...

@xpahos xpahos mentioned this issue Sep 10, 2023
@smac89 smac89 mentioned this issue Sep 15, 2023
@arjunmenon
Copy link

@icedream @bluszcz Is the fork production ready?

@tgf9
Copy link

tgf9 commented Jul 6, 2024

Maybe @jrmiller82 can volunteer to create the next active fork. He was giving the maintainer shit for trying to monetize his work #259 (comment) OK, here are the consequences. LMAO 🤣

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants