You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
cutoff (for low pass filter, aka vcf effect) is in units that are similar to Hz at typical sample rates, while hcutoff (for high pass filter, aka hpf effect) and bandf (for band pass/reject filter) are not scaled and are expected to be less than 1
cutoff
(for low pass filter, aka vcf effect) is in units that are similar to Hz at typical sample rates, whilehcutoff
(for high pass filter, aka hpf effect) andbandf
(for band pass/reject filter) are not scaled and are expected to be less than 1Neither is truly sample rate independent, but I wasted 30mins today wondering why
hcutoff 0.001
was doing what I wanted butcutoff 0.1
wasn't.Should we make
hcutoff
andbandf
also scale byCUTOFFRATIO
?Should we add an additional factor of
44100.0/g_samplerate
to try to make them more independent of sample rate?These changes would change how things sound, might need to be behind a compatibility flag?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: