-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 140
No module-less runtime present in dist/ #137
Comments
@lazd - It is possible, yes. But I'd like to understand your use case more first. Can you explain in a bit more detail what you are looking for? |
Yes I'd love to ship an optimized bundled build, it's just not a priority right now. cc @eventualbuddha |
Right now, I'm including HTMLBars in a set of benchmarks of template systems as part of DOMly. I have a super old build marked as 0.1.0 that supported the module-less use case, and I'm using that (I think I ripped it from a demo). In updating DOMly's dependencies, I checked back on HTMLBars to see if I could use npm or bower to fetch it instead of including it in the repo, but I'd rather not introduce AMD just to load HTMLBars. |
@eventualbuddha's work would get us to a global build, but we could also create a custom build for globals that included loader.js in a closure. It is not ideal, but it would be a globals mode. I'd welcome it as a contribution for the interim. |
Is this still up-for-grabs or should this be closed? I see this is referenced in commits. @mixonic |
@kuzirashi seems like commit is part of #300 |
I see. So this needs to be open. |
It would be nice to have a runtime distribution that exposes
window.HTMLBars
in environments that don't use a module system.Is this possible given the fact that the project is relying heavily on modules?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: