Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add-access-rule - Amazing work! #34

Open
atscripter opened this issue Nov 30, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

add-access-rule - Amazing work! #34

atscripter opened this issue Nov 30, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@atscripter
Copy link

Tim - I am surprised no one has commented or thanked you for this. This is great work and an incredibly useful tool for us POSH users. Ran a couple of commands against my lab CheckPoint cluster and they worked beautifully. So thank you!

I see in your documentation many place-holder commands that have yet to be implemented. I am especially interested in the add-access-rule functionality and willing to help with the development. I have some experience developing POSH code for BigIP iControl ReST API and can put those skills to use here.

@tkoopman tkoopman changed the title Amazing work! add-access-rule - Amazing work! Dec 2, 2018
@tkoopman
Copy link
Owner

tkoopman commented Dec 2, 2018

Your thanks is most welcome. Many have thanked in past over in the CheckMates forum.

As for if you would like to assist, you would be more than welcome. I have not been adding much of late as it currently does everything I need and no requests have come in. Now I have one I will try and get to it but currently due to personal reasons it may not be until after Christmas.

If you want to have a go please have a look at tkoopman/CheckPoint.NET as this is where all the ReST API stuff goes. Once implemented there it can then be implemented in psCheckPoint. Creating a new access rule does already exist there, so should just the be POSH side needs doing. That said I have only done basic testing of it in CheckPoint.NET so may need more work.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants