Replies: 1 comment
-
I don't mind at all supporting ETSI variations, especially because they are usually quite simple to implement. Puccini already makes an effort to support all versions of TOSCA since 1.0 as well as various dialects and variations. If ETSI requirements are reasonable we can add them, so feel free to propose some additions. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi @tliron :
So far the etsinfv meta-quirk only activates other basic quirks related to how TOSCA is interpreted.
But ETSI mandates some extra restrictions such as:
ETSI-Entry-Licenses
are mandatoryDo you think it would be interesting to add those validations, or do you prefer puccini to be focused on "plain TOSCA" and defer those validations to external tools?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions