Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test double-observer option #48

Open
jcarlis3 opened this issue Oct 6, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

Test double-observer option #48

jcarlis3 opened this issue Oct 6, 2017 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@jcarlis3
Copy link
Collaborator

jcarlis3 commented Oct 6, 2017

In the update to version 2.0.x, we have only focused on calculating detection functions with single observers (the default in dfuncEstim), and haven't tested implementation of the double-observer functionality that was in previous package versions. These functions should be checked and tested with double-observer data:

  • dfuncEstim (where the observer argument is passed)
  • F.gx.estim
  • F.double.obs.prob

In the meantime, I will add an error message to dfuncEstim if the user changes the observer argument from its default value of "both".

@jcarlis3
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jcarlis3 commented Nov 1, 2017

@tmcd82070 suggested a more-formal and more-flexible implementation of double-observer data input and mark-recapture distance sampling should be on the horizon, likely warranting a version 3.0 update.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants