Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Testing equivalency of proteoform sequences #20

Open
acesnik opened this issue Feb 6, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Testing equivalency of proteoform sequences #20

acesnik opened this issue Feb 6, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@acesnik
Copy link
Contributor

acesnik commented Feb 6, 2018

Testing the chemical formula and sequence of the residues should be sufficient to address this question and enable comparisons using different PTM databases.

@acesnik
Copy link
Contributor Author

acesnik commented Feb 27, 2018

Matching with ambiguity

There may be several types of ambiguity:

  1. Modified residues may be isobaric with other amino acids
  2. Structural variations (e.g. glycans) may have the same mass
  3. Mass tags may be attributable to several modifications
  4. Comparing proteoform IDs with ambiguous localizations with each other or with completely characterized proteoforms

Our equivalence test might need to output a match score (similar to BLAST) or a match classification (exact, ambiguous, non-match)

@acesnik acesnik added this to the ProForma 2.0 milestone Sep 10, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant