Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix BoundaryModelDummyParticles() for FSI #53

Open
6 of 7 tasks
LasNikas opened this issue Jan 12, 2023 · 3 comments
Open
6 of 7 tasks

Fix BoundaryModelDummyParticles() for FSI #53

LasNikas opened this issue Jan 12, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working discussion

Comments

@LasNikas
Copy link
Collaborator

LasNikas commented Jan 12, 2023

@LasNikas LasNikas added bug Something isn't working discussion labels Jan 12, 2023
@efaulhaber
Copy link
Member

We could just implement setups with analytical density profiles and run the simulation without relaxing part.

Keep in mind that with the higher density at the bottom of the tank, the particles are not just closer together in y-direction, but also in x-direction. In these examples, we can't really see that, but I assume that this is the reason for non-uniform particle distributions. It is therefore not easy to determine the correct positions analytically.

@svchb
Copy link
Collaborator

svchb commented Nov 1, 2023

@LasNikas This seems to be a small issue left open. Can you finish this?

@LasNikas
Copy link
Collaborator Author

LasNikas commented Nov 1, 2023

see #262
Note, that the simulation falling_spheres_2d.jl needs about twice the number of time steps with #262 @svchb @efaulhaber

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working discussion
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants