Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Goal: Get Usage Metrics From TSN #427

Open
2 of 7 tasks
outerlook opened this issue Jul 29, 2024 · 10 comments
Open
2 of 7 tasks

Goal: Get Usage Metrics From TSN #427

outerlook opened this issue Jul 29, 2024 · 10 comments

Comments

@outerlook
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @markholdex, I see you previously converted #383 to a goal, but I'm structuring it slightly differently as there are other sub-tasks which #383 is also part of

does this make sense?

@outerlook outerlook mentioned this issue Jul 29, 2024
38 tasks
@outerlook
Copy link
Contributor Author

@zolotokrylin @markholdex

Does this goal's inclusion on the TSN project's "TODO" list mean I can work on it if I'm blocked by other tasks?

@zolotokrylin
Copy link
Contributor

@outerlook deffinatly. Are requirements already 100% clear/specified?

@markholdex
Copy link
Collaborator

markholdex commented Aug 7, 2024

@zolotokrylin @markholdex

Does this goal's inclusion on the TSN project's "TODO" list mean I can work on it if I'm blocked by other tasks?

Pretty much. As long as the specs/requirements are clear and defined. However, always check with other priorities on the roadmap.

This metrics are more oriented for the consumer. Think about the fact that we might need metrics related to the nodes

that we are deploying soon (runtime, fails, response time, etc.). It might be a separate Goal but I wanted to mention here so you can consider the right priority.

@markholdex
Copy link
Collaborator

markholdex commented Sep 16, 2024

@outerlook is this Goal a duplicate of

@outerlook
Copy link
Contributor Author

Not exactly, but there is some overlap. I previously asked something similar here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-yxCyunqLhIHqLGJrIqScqRduo_lB3Ee6LGyeyY4B3A/edit?pli=1&disco=AAABUTVC6wo

However, this goal was previously more targetted at getting through KGW to serve the billing spec

the plan was just knowing how was the network being queried, with no intention to know what is happening at node level.

However, the new goal was raised more target at knowing what is going on specifically with nodes, how they are behaving if they are answering and participating the network.

The metrics are very similar, but the mechanism may be different, and the #415 results may impact this present goal, while using some of its same subset of problems (or mechanics)

I think we should reevaluate this one after #415 gets merged, since we may have easier ways to observe what we need

@MicBun
Copy link
Contributor

MicBun commented Nov 1, 2024

log: added blocked by Kwil DB v0.9 to the issue description

@markholdex
Copy link
Collaborator

@outerlook feel free to wrap things up here as your next priority. Thank you!

@markholdex
Copy link
Collaborator

@outerlook have you started on this Goal? Do you have any ETA in mind?

@outerlook
Copy link
Contributor Author

hey @markholdex

no I didn't, I'm tackling these which appeared to be prioritized:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants