We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Core.Compiler.validate_code_in_debug_mode
ERROR: LoadError: UndefVarError: `validate_code_in_debug_mode` not defined in `Core.Compiler` Stacktrace: [1] getproperty @ ./Base.jl:42 [inlined] [2] Core.Compiler.InferenceState(result::Core.Compiler.InferenceResult, cache::Symbol, interp::StaticCompiler.StaticInterpreter) @ StaticCompiler ~/.julia/packages/StaticCompiler/Uki9T/src/interpreter.jl:89 [3] typeinf_frame @ ./compiler/typeinfer.jl:1003 [inlined] [4] typeinf_code @ ./compiler/typeinfer.jl:948 [inlined] [5] typeinf_code(interp::StaticCompiler.StaticInterpreter, match::Core.MethodMatch, run_optimizer::Bool) @ Core.Compiler ./compiler/typeinfer.jl:9
Also many other errors on 1.11: https://s3.amazonaws.com/julialang-reports/nanosoldier/pkgeval/by_hash/0520b80_vs_bd47eca/StaticTools.primary.log
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Does 1.11 just break every package?
Sorry, something went wrong.
Packages that are coded in such a way that they e.g. access random symbols inside e.g. Core.Compiler tend to break on every minor version, yes.
Core.Compiler
Oh I see, it's the casette-type stuff, I've never touched that part of the code here. It does seem like an unusually high rate though.
No branches or pull requests
Also many other errors on 1.11: https://s3.amazonaws.com/julialang-reports/nanosoldier/pkgeval/by_hash/0520b80_vs_bd47eca/StaticTools.primary.log
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: