Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Sweep: Fix "Document is not defined" error in Angular 18 particle rendering #113

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Sweep: Fix "Document is not defined" error in Angular 18 particle rendering #113

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

sweep-ai[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@sweep-ai sweep-ai bot commented Jun 6, 2024

Purpose

This pull request addresses an issue where the Document is not defined when rendering particles in an Angular 18 environment, causing an error to be displayed despite the particles rendering correctly.

Description

The changes in this pull request ensure that the particle rendering is only initialized when the application is running in a browser environment, by checking the PLATFORM_ID and using the isPlatformBrowser function from @angular/common. This resolves the "Document is not defined" error that was occurring in the server-side rendering (SSR) environment.

Summary

  • Updated the ngAfterViewInit method in the NgxParticlesComponent to check if the platform is a browser before initializing the particle rendering.
  • Imported the isPlatformBrowser function from @angular/common to perform the platform check.

Fixes #112.

Tip

To get Sweep to edit this pull request, you can:

  • Comment below, and Sweep can edit the entire PR
  • Comment on a file, Sweep will only modify the commented file
  • Edit the original issue to get Sweep to recreate the PR from scratch

This is an automated message generated by Sweep AI.

@sweep-ai sweep-ai bot added the sweep Assigns Sweep to an issue or pull request. label Jun 6, 2024
@sweep-ai sweep-ai bot mentioned this pull request Jun 6, 2024
Open
@sweep-ai Sweep AI
Copy link
Contributor Author

sweep-ai bot commented Jun 6, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Sweep: PR Review

Author: sweep-ai[bot]
The Pull Request looks good! Sweep did not find any issues.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 6, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
size/XS sweep Assigns Sweep to an issue or pull request.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Document is not defined
0 participants