You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The wrapper of text fields seems to be closed for modification. I see that it handles the RTL direction with a ternary operator though this became an issue for me. In our current situation, RTL is well handled on the view level, and the direction of items are handled automatically.
Turning the direction to RTL + another RTL on the wrapper below will revert back to the position of the items.
Describe the solution you'd like
Technically, removing the condition and simply passing row-reverse and just sticking with row will fix this BUT I'd recommend having a way for us to extend the style of the input wrapper.
Describe alternatives you've considered
I can't think of any alternative because the issue lies within the wrapper of items.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The wrapper of text fields seems to be closed for modification. I see that it handles the RTL direction with a ternary operator though this became an issue for me. In our current situation, RTL is well handled on the view level, and the direction of items are handled automatically.
Turning the direction to RTL + another RTL on the wrapper below will revert back to the position of the items.
Describe the solution you'd like
Technically, removing the condition and simply passing
row-reverse
and just sticking withrow
will fix this BUT I'd recommend having a way for us to extend the style of the input wrapper.Describe alternatives you've considered
I can't think of any alternative because the issue lies within the wrapper of items.
Additional context
This code below causes some issues for us.
This led to this :
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: