We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
There is a problem when one want to program on stuff like prob.pars.
Imagine you want to create such an expression by programming.
Here is a diff that might fix this
--- a/R/findExperiments.R +++ b/R/findExperiments.R @@ -48,15 +48,14 @@ findExperiments = function(reg, ids, prob.pattern, prob.pars return(ids) jobs = getJobs(reg, ids, check.ids = FALSE) - if (!missing(prob.pars)) { ind = vapply(jobs, function(job, pars, ee) eval(pars, job$prob.pars, ee), - logical(1L), pars = substitute(prob.pars), ee = parent.frame() + logical(1L), pars = prob.pars, ee = parent.frame()) jobs = jobs[!is.na(ind) & ind] } if (!missing(algo.pars)) { ind = vapply(jobs, function(job, pars, ee) eval(pars, job$algo.pars, ee), - logical(1L), pars = substitute(algo.pars), ee = parent.frame() + logical(1L), pars = algo.pars, ee = parent.frame()) jobs = jobs[!is.na(ind) & ind] } return(extractSubList(jobs, "id", element.value = integer(1L)))
If we touch this we need to properly test different cases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
There is a problem when one want to program on stuff like prob.pars.
Imagine you want to create such an expression by programming.
Here is a diff that might fix this
If we touch this we need to properly test different cases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: