Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Transfer to typelevel github org (make sure docs work) #1973

Closed
jatcwang opened this issue Jan 7, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Transfer to typelevel github org (make sure docs work) #1973

jatcwang opened this issue Jan 7, 2024 · 2 comments
Milestone

Comments

@jatcwang
Copy link
Collaborator

jatcwang commented Jan 7, 2024

Top priority is to make sure doc site works.

@jatcwang jatcwang added this to the 1.0 milestone Jan 7, 2024
@valencik
Copy link
Member

valencik commented Sep 2, 2024

Hey @jatcwang!
(cc'ing @armanbilge as he was advising on the move)

Happy to see doobie migrated over to the typelevel github org! 🎉
I suppose that means this issue is technically complete.

I'm hoping however you can comment on the plans for publishing going forward.

  1. Is the plan to publish the next RC from Typelevel GitHub but still at the org.tpolecat coordinates?
  2. Do you want to eventually do RC releases with org.typelevel coords?

I think we should document the plan / intent, and then we can post a quick update on the Typelevel blog so people know what to expect (I can write that up).

@jatcwang
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jatcwang commented Sep 3, 2024

Hi @valencik thanks :) Yes the plan is for the upcoming 1.0-RC6 will be the last release published to org.tpolecat coordinate. After that we'll be migrating the package name to org.typelevel.doobie (#1972) and publish to org.typelevel coordinate.

👍 on the typelevel blog too. I'll draft a rough post once we have all the pieces (scalafix rule etc) and I'll reach out to you to polish it. Many thanks!

@jatcwang jatcwang closed this as completed Sep 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants