Include AdGuard Annoyance Filters #137
endocrine7132
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
I meant adding an option to enable the AdGuard variants to the currently included EasyList options. So for example, provide the option for a user to either enable EasyList Cookies or AdGuard Cookies list.
…________________________________
From: garry-ut99 ***@***.***>
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2024 2:06 AM
To: uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home ***@***.***>
Cc: endocrine7132 ***@***.***>; Author ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home] Include AdGuard Annoyance Filters (Discussion #137)
both the EasyList and AdGuard Annoyance filters
Some of EasyList annoyance filters are already included in uBOL, unless you mean the others which are still not.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#137 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BJHGBJICS45IYHV7L4ZV3OTZI7HPFAVCNFSM6AAAAABJLVYGMOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43SRDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHM4TQNJXGU2TG>.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
|
Continue here, because currently it has evolved into a discussion regarding "the whole existence of AdGuard lists in the whole uBlock extensions": |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I was wondering if including both the EasyList and AdGuard Annoyance filters would be possible as user-enabled filter options? Or if the size of these respective filters would be such that including both would bump uBOL up against the maximum MV3 filter list count?
I have found that AdGuard's versions of the Annoyance filters include some helpful cosmetic filtering rules that block pop-up overlays and other web annoyances on some of the sites I visit better than the EasyList variants do.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions