Issues/mistakes in 'original' parameter files ie CMT2,3,4,5,6,7,12,20,21,31,44 #709
Replies: 11 comments
-
ISSUE/MISTAKE 1 ALSO, in the dimvegetation file |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
ISSUE/MISTAKE 2 CMT1 and CMT2 moss CMT3 moss CMT5 Sphagnum CMT5 Sphagnum CMT7 Moss CMT12 Feather CMT20 Feather CMT21 Feather, OtherMiss, Sphagnum CMT31 Sphagnum CMT44 Feather |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
ISSUE/MISTAKE 3 CMT4 ALL ARE INCORRECT |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
ISSUE/MISTAKE 4 CMT4 ALL ARE INCORRECT |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Moss LAI for CMT3 should be low as moss PFT are minor in deciduous forest.
Let’s review these tomorrow if we have time and you can join the meeting.
Helene
… On Apr 15, 2024, at 9:18 AM, jsclein-uaf ***@***.***> wrote:
ISSUE/MISTAKE 2
dimvegetation file see below, especially CMT20, but some others are odd too
these are ONLY mosses that I have looked
CMT1 and CMT2 moss
initial LAI and 12 months of static LAI are 9.7135
CMT3 moss
initial LAI and 12 months of static LAI are 0.3008
CMT5 Sphagnum
initial LAI and 12 months of static LAI are 1.8 initial, then 2.0 for remainder
CMT5 Sphagnum
initial LAI and 12 months of static LAI are 2.1 initial, then 1.5 for remainder
FEATHER is 1.9 initial, and 1.5 for static all 12 months
CMT7 Moss
initial LAI and 12 months of static LAI are 1.5
CMT12 Feather
initial LAI and 12 months of static LAI are 2.0
CMT20 Feather
initial LAI and 12 months of static LAI are 1.5 BUT THE STATIC are INCORRECT (they vary too much)
OtherMoss BUT THE STATIC are INCORRECT (they vary too much)
CMT21 Feather, OtherMiss, Sphagnum
initial LAI and 12 months of static LAI are 2.0
CMT31 Sphagnum
initial LAI and 12 months of static LAI are 5.024
Moss values are 0.483
CMT44 Feather
initial LAI and 12 months of static LAI are 2.0
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#705 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AANVJFYSHD3XOGPLUNIXYQ3Y5QDWBAVCNFSM6AAAAABGHXY6JSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDANJXGQZTGOJVGU>.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hey folks we changed this from an issue to discussion. Ideas is that as we address each CMT we can create an issue and associated topic branch and PR for that issue. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Here is another one: check the root to shoot ratio for sedges in CMT05 [ overestimation] |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
HERE is another one, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Parameter in dim vegetation file THESE ARE OK/// |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Should write a check that all PFTs that are not defined (i.e. named none, misc, misc. ,pft0, pft1, etc) have all zero values. If |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
ANOTHER ISSUE for CMT3 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
sometimes a CMT might have a mistake, we might want to double check things like the LAI (over the 12 months) making sure that the trend is what it is supposed to be,
for example,
should lichen, moss, sphagnum and maybe other moss, value be 1.5 for all 12 months
double check the sedges, (this is PFT that I found mistakes in a couple PFTs
and there might be a couple more numbers that we want to spot check in ALL CMTs
why is this important
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions