Improve Task Assignment Limit Handling

[0x4007]

Problem
Contributors are blocked from assigning new tasks due to the current task limit, even when they’ve addressed all open review threads and are waiting on reviewers. This bottleneck discourages contributors and slows down productivity.

Proposed Solution

1. Add logic to check if the assignee is the last commenter on all unresolved review threads.¹
2. Introduce a 24-hour timeout after the last comment before considering tasks "reviewer-lagged."
3. Allow contributors to bypass the limit in such cases without affecting their task slots.

Concerns

• Assignees might misuse this by "resolving" threads without addressing the issues.
• Additional safeguards may be needed to ensure resolution integrity.

References

• Original comment thread: #100.

Footnotes

1. ⚠ 50% possible duplicate - Improve Task Limiter ↩

[ubiquity-os-beta]

Note

The following contributors may be suitable for this task:

gentlementlegen

0% Match ubiquity-os-marketplace/daemon-pricing#47

0x4007

0% Match ubiquity/work.ubq.fi#125

[jordan-ae]

/start

[ubiquity-os-beta]

Deadline	Fri, Dec 13, 4:09 PM UTC
Beneficiary	0x2F05fD58023B0a95d1866aa0A3b672cEf05945c5

Tip

• Use /wallet 0x0000...0000 if you want to update your registered payment wallet address.
• Be sure to open a draft pull request as soon as possible to communicate updates on your progress.
• Be sure to provide timely updates to us when requested, or you will be automatically unassigned from the task.

[ubiquity-os-beta]

Passed the disqualification threshold and no activity is detected, removing assignees: @jordan-ae.

[ubiquity-os-beta]

Passed the disqualification threshold and no activity is detected, removing assignees: @jordan-ae.

[ubiquity-os-beta]

Passed the disqualification threshold and no activity is detected, removing assignees: @jordan-ae.

[ubiquity-os-beta]

Passed the disqualification threshold and no activity is detected, removing assignees: @jordan-ae.

[ubiquity-os-beta]

Passed the disqualification threshold and no activity is detected, removing assignees: @jordan-ae.

[ubiquity-os-beta]

Passed the disqualification threshold and no activity is detected, removing assignees: @jordan-ae.

[ubiquity-os-beta]

Passed the disqualification threshold and no activity is detected, removing assignees: @jordan-ae.

[ubiquity-os-beta]

Passed the disqualification threshold and no activity is detected, removing assignees: @jordan-ae.

[ubiquity-os-beta]

Passed the disqualification threshold and no activity is detected, removing assignees: @jordan-ae.

[ubiquity-os-beta]

Passed the disqualification threshold and no activity is detected, removing assignees: @jordan-ae.

[ubiquity-os-beta]

Passed the disqualification threshold and no activity is detected, removing assignees: @jordan-ae.

[ubiquity-os-beta]

Passed the disqualification threshold and no activity is detected, removing assignees: @jordan-ae.

[ubiquity-os-beta]

Passed the disqualification threshold and no activity is detected, removing assignees: @jordan-ae.

[Sadaf-A]

/start

[ubiquity-os-beta]

Deadline	Mon, Dec 16, 8:11 AM UTC
Beneficiary	0x0BEd00438D57d07E3667b85Fa8EB86Af147C7025

Tip

• Use /wallet 0x0000...0000 if you want to update your registered payment wallet address.
• Be sure to open a draft pull request as soon as possible to communicate updates on your progress.
• Be sure to provide timely updates to us when requested, or you will be automatically unassigned from the task.

[ubiquity-os-beta]

Passed the disqualification threshold and no activity is detected, removing assignees: @Sadaf-A.

[gentlementlegen]

The 24 hour delay is already implemented. How do you believe a bypass can safely be implemented for contributors? Also, the last comment being the user can be implemented but most likely will make the command slow and unresponsive, maybe too slow to run on Workers.

[0x4007]

The 24 hour delay is already implemented. How do you believe a bypass can safely be implemented for contributors?

Unfortunately, the best idea I have requires using an LLM to read the thread and see if the changes were implemented. Seems a bit much, but I can't see how else it would be possible to determine if the problem was actually resolved.

Also, the last comment being the user can be implemented but most likely will make the command slow and unresponsive, maybe too slow to run on Workers.

This can be a problem, but I would imagine that contributors should not have more than two pull requests open. It's not that much data, so maybe it's not so slow?

[Sadaf-A]

/start

[gentlementlegen]

/start

[ubiquity-os-beta]

Deadline	Sat, Dec 21, 12:36 PM UTC
Beneficiary	0x0fC1b909ba9265A846b82CF4CE352fc3e7EeB2ED

Tip

• Use /wallet 0x0000...0000 if you want to update your registered payment wallet address.
• Be sure to open a draft pull request as soon as possible to communicate updates on your progress.
• Be sure to provide timely updates to us when requested, or you will be automatically unassigned from the task.

[gentlementlegen]

/stop

[Sadaf-A]

/start

[ubiquity-os-beta]

! You do not have the adequate role to start this task (your role is: member). Allowed roles are: collaborator, admin.