merra2 data used in control_csawmg test #699
Labels
bug
Something isn't working
Comments
|
@SMoorthi-emc @AnningCheng-NOAA May I ask if the control_csawmg (with IAER=1111) should use the same MERRA2 data as the control_merra2 test (with IAER=1011)? Any additional code changes are required to use the new merra2 data under /scratch1/NCEPDEV/global/glopara/fix/fix_aer (now in input-data-20210717/FV3_input_data_INCCN_aeroclim/MERRA2)? Thanks |
|
I think there is supposed to be only one Merra2 data. However, I will let
Anning answer.
Moorthi
…On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 12:08 PM Jun Wang ***@***.***> wrote:
@SMoorthi-emc <https://github.com/SMoorthi-emc> @AnningCheng-NOAA
<https://github.com/AnningCheng-NOAA> May I ask if the control_csawmg
(with IAER=1111) should use the same MERRA2 data as the control_merra2 test
(with IAER=1011)? Any additional code changes are required to use the new
merra2 data under /scratch1/NCEPDEV/global/glopara/fix/fix_aer (now in
input-data-20210717/FV3_input_data_INCCN_aeroclim/MERRA2)? Thanks
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#699 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALLVRYR2H4A63ZP7LJW5DCLTYWNO7ANCNFSM5AWDHSDA>
.
--
Dr. Shrinivas Moorthi
Research Meteorologist
Modeling and Data Assimilation Branch
Environmental Modeling Center / National Centers for Environmental
Prediction
5830 University Research Court - (W/NP23), College Park MD 20740 USA
Tel: (301)683-3718
e-mail: ***@***.***
Phone: (301) 683-3718 Fax: (301) 683-3718
|
|
Jun and Moorthi, I prefer to use iaer=1011 for CSAWMG3 although we have not
got time to test with MERRA2.
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 12:49 PM SMoorthi-emc ***@***.***>
wrote:
… I think there is supposed to be only one Merra2 data. However, I will let
Anning answer.
Moorthi
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 12:08 PM Jun Wang ***@***.***> wrote:
> @SMoorthi-emc <https://github.com/SMoorthi-emc> @AnningCheng-NOAA
> <https://github.com/AnningCheng-NOAA> May I ask if the control_csawmg
> (with IAER=1111) should use the same MERRA2 data as the control_merra2
test
> (with IAER=1011)? Any additional code changes are required to use the new
> merra2 data under /scratch1/NCEPDEV/global/glopara/fix/fix_aer (now in
> input-data-20210717/FV3_input_data_INCCN_aeroclim/MERRA2)? Thanks
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <
#699 (comment)
>,
> or unsubscribe
> <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALLVRYR2H4A63ZP7LJW5DCLTYWNO7ANCNFSM5AWDHSDA
>
> .
>
--
Dr. Shrinivas Moorthi
Research Meteorologist
Modeling and Data Assimilation Branch
Environmental Modeling Center / National Centers for Environmental
Prediction
5830 University Research Court - (W/NP23), College Park MD 20740 USA
Tel: (301)683-3718
e-mail: ***@***.***
Phone: (301) 683-3718 Fax: (301) 683-3718
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#699 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALQPMIPAMP7WJB4P2URDTK3TYWSJBANCNFSM5AWDHSDA>
.
|
|
@AnningCheng-NOAA would you please test the control_csawmg with iaer=1011 and let us know if it is working? |
|
Jun, I have made a new run with iaer-1011 for CSAWMG
at /scratch1/NCEPDEV/stmp2/Anning.Cheng/FV3_RT/rt_80985/control_csawmg.
AODs, clouds, and precipitation look well.
…On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 11:48 AM Jun Wang ***@***.***> wrote:
@AnningCheng-NOAA <https://github.com/AnningCheng-NOAA> would you please
test the control_csawmg with iaer=1011 and let us know if it is working?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#699 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALQPMIKGRQPHZO3WOPLV6KTTZ3IN5ANCNFSM5AWDHSDA>
.
|
|
Thanks, Anning. I will test the control_csawmg with iaer=1011 on jet to see if it passes. |
|
@AnningCheng-NOAA @SMoorthi-emc The control_csawmg test passed with iaer=1011 on jet. So I will change iaer to 1011 for this test. |
14 tasks
epic-cicd-jenkins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 17, 2023
…ol file issue (#699) The March 24, 2023 update to the ufs-weather-model (36d6e16), updated UPP and corrected issues associated with the post control file. The ufs-weather-model hash has been updated to 36d6e16 and the UPP hash has been updated to 22cfb88. The changes required to allow the previous versions of ufs-weather-model and UPP to run the run_post tasks were removed.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Description
In the ufs-weather-model develop branch, the control_csawmg test has the option IAER=1111, it was using merra2 data in /scratch1/NCEPDEV/nems/emc.nemspara/RT/NEMSfv3gfs/input-data-20210614/FV3_input_data_INCCN_aeroclim/MERRA2. The test passed on all the UFS supported platforms.
Anning updated MERRA2 data and found that the data in input-data-20210614/FV3_input_data_INCCN_aeroclim/MERRA2 causes issues in control_merra2 test (with IAER=1011) and the P7b coupled test. So the latest merra2 data in input-data-20210717/FV3_input_data_INCCN_aeroclim/MERRA2 is now updated to use data in /scratch1/NCEPDEV/global/glopara/fix/fix_aer as Anning suggested.
However using the new merra2 data causes the control_csawmg test to fail on jet with error message:
To Reproduce:
Additional context
The issue showed up in PR#639.
Now we need to figure out what merra2 data the control_csawmg test with (IAER=1111) should use
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: