UW Release Requirements #164
Unanswered
christinaholtNOAA
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment
-
@christinaholtNOAA I think you have it under "We should have tools that allow us to treat any config file as a flat file template." but i thought i will clarify it here. Working with JCSDA and EMC, it becoming clear that "centers" will be responsible for a reference template configuration. The format of reference centers might be different. So a successful tool should be able to recognize multiple templating languages. It will be good to understand how UW config management solution will be similar/different/complimentary/orthogonal from what is already developed and used for GDASapp and EWOK. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Over the years, we've gathered (mostly verbally) the requirements for the Unified Workflow standalone tools. Mostly these are about what is needed for the tool to be adopted in the UFS Apps/components.
Specifics of the config management tools for the first release:
Which ones have I missed here? Other than requests for demos, what additionsl outstanding questions do we still have about this release. Others may come out of follow-up demos.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions