Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename components and sync with wiki names #479

Open
4 tasks
Alfiva opened this issue Jun 6, 2017 · 2 comments
Open
4 tasks

Rename components and sync with wiki names #479

Alfiva opened this issue Jun 6, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@Alfiva
Copy link
Member

Alfiva commented Jun 6, 2017

  • establish a naming convention
  • rename components to naming convention
  • rename components to better reflect their functionality
  • rename wiki pages to fit the names in the repository
@Alfiva Alfiva closed this as completed Jun 6, 2017
@amedranogil amedranogil changed the title GForge placeholder - trackeritem 479 Rename components and sync with wiki names Jun 17, 2017
@amedranogil amedranogil reopened this Jun 17, 2017
@cstockloew
Copy link
Member

Fully agree (and from Alvaro's answer to uaal_issues R1 he also seems to agree)
Is this a voting? Because I could actually check all 4 choices..

First: the folder ri.exportComponent can be removed; they are fully(?) contained in smp.ri.exportComponent.

Maybe we should have a list of actual functionality, used libs, if the component is used as Client or Server, and if the component is called directly (local = need to be available locally) or via the buses (space) e.g.

  • ri.servicegateway, Server, http-servlets, jetty, local
  • ri.internetgateway, Clent, webservices, Apache Axis, local
  • ...

(hope, this is correct). Should we have any other criteria? Maybe we should provide a table with this info on the wiki main page..

I guess, the used lib mainly determines which functionality is actually provided. Although having this lib in the bundle name somehow against uaal-rules..

What do you think? How should we proceed?

@cstockloew
Copy link
Member

ri.profile.agent can be removed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants