Suggestion: pipeWith to use curried format

[finnmerlett]

I like the syntactic sugar of pipeWith, as it follows more logically in my head (and also nicely emulates the way RxJs does things). That said, I feel like the distinction between the first parameter and the rest could be made clearer by changing the format to

pipeWith(dataIn)(
  fn1,
  fn2,
  fn3
) // etc

Alternatively, you could add it with a different name like pipeFrom to avoid it being a breaking change.