Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Hi, To support meaningful (not necessary semantic) versioning, we need proper development cycles and different branches and whatever else... That requires some extra effort and time which is always in value. Currently the idea is the following:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi. This is not meant as criticism; I love using Bun, and I will continue to do so, no matter the versioning strategy. But versioning is about communication with the users, so I thought I would ask.
I have noticed that since v1.0.0, all new releases have been releases as PATCH versions (1.0.x). Some of the versions are adding new features, which according to semantic versioning, would trigger MINOR releases.
Now, I don't know how closely this project is aiming to follow semver, and I am not asking you to change your versioning strategy, but as versioning is about communication with the users, I am just curious to know the thoughts behind the current versioning. Which change would trigger a MINOR release, for instance.
Cheers.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions