-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
extensions.txt allowing multiple categories #80
Comments
I believe we already do allow a list of categories. For example in a Biblica project |
I thought Paratext had a restriction on categories in the marker check, but I just looked at the code and it doesn't appear to care what is put there. We did add some UI to guide users in adding categories and the UI may be restrictive. |
The UI is implemented for Study Bibles in the Study Bible project interface. In Study bibles the category is limited by the interface to one category. That said multiple categories can be implemented using combined categories such as, for example, Biblica use caseIn Biblica we had a need to mark footnotes for reduplication. We also needed to mark footnotes for different publication styles where some publishers wanted minimal footnotes and others wanted to publish with all the footnotes, and others somewhere in between. Initially we added some markup to the verse numbers, which we used in our publishing process and stripped when we put the project on the DBL. |
No this is the \category field in extensions.md not the \cat marker in USFM. |
Added to 3.1.1 |
\rem, \sts are both allowed in a number of places in the grammar. Do we want to allow this for other markers and to allow the \category field to take a list of categories?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: