Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 26, 2020. It is now read-only.

Contributors covers up banner image #228

Open
emartinez-usgs opened this issue Jan 21, 2016 · 4 comments
Open

Contributors covers up banner image #228

emartinez-usgs opened this issue Jan 21, 2016 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@emartinez-usgs
Copy link
Member

The way in which the site header is implemented currently allows contributor images to cover up part (or all) of the banner background image. It would be better if any amount of contributor logos simply pushed the banner image over as well.

This could be accomplished by removing all the position absolute styles and just using a display inline block or some other layout.

@ehunter-usgs ehunter-usgs self-assigned this Aug 1, 2017
@ehunter-usgs
Copy link
Member

ehunter-usgs commented Aug 1, 2017

Can we just remove the banner image and use a primary/secondary color on the site banner? Something like this feels much less distracting and (IMHO) highlights the page content:

screen shot 2017-06-21 at 3 52 34 pm

@jmfee-usgs
Copy link
Contributor

I don't think we can remove the cooperator logos.

@lisa-usgs : what are your thoughts on this?

@ehunter-usgs
Copy link
Member

@jmfee-usgs @lisa-usgs I didn't mean to remove the cooperator logos, I just meant to remove the banner image

@lisa-usgs
Copy link
Member

lisa-usgs commented Aug 1, 2017

@jmfee-usgs @ehunter-usgs I thought Eddie was suggesting that we drop the banner, but keep the logos. I think we should keep the banner because that's important branding for EHP (at least until USGS subsumes all the websites and mandates a new template for all non-Drupal webpages). The logos at the top make for a cluttered look, but I understand the importance of their prominence for the regional networks. Maybe we need to brainstorm alternative locations for the logos again.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants