You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed a problem with the reading of 2 variables in the Control Data Section of a PEST Control File for PESTPP-GLM v5.2.7. When I used the following "traditional PEST" format in the PEST Control File, the 2 variables PHIREDSWH and NRELPAR were read correctly according to input echoed in the the .rec file:
On the other hand, when I defined pertinent PESTPP-GLM variables in a "* control data keyword" section following the new "enhanced" format, the variables were not read correctly according to input echoed in the .rec file:
PHIREDSWH was incorrectly set to 0.1 and NRELPAR was incorrectly set to 3. I wonder if I am entering the new enhanced format incorrectly (thus being ignored by PESTPP-GLM), or if there might be a bug? I prefer the new "enhanced format" but for now will use the "traditional PEST" format.
Thanks,
Steve
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
you are correct - those two args were not being processed from the control data keyword section (just lazy on my part - didnt think anyone was using them!). They will added for the next release.
Hello PEST++ Team,
I noticed a problem with the reading of 2 variables in the Control Data Section of a PEST Control File for PESTPP-GLM v5.2.7. When I used the following "traditional PEST" format in the PEST Control File, the 2 variables PHIREDSWH and NRELPAR were read correctly according to input echoed in the the .rec file:
restart estimation
668 114253 15 0 35
1 2 double point 1
10.0 -3.0 0.3 0.03 8
2.222 2.222 0.001
0.05
0 0.0075 4 4 0.0075 4
0 0 0
On the other hand, when I defined pertinent PESTPP-GLM variables in a "* control data keyword" section following the new "enhanced" format, the variables were not read correctly according to input echoed in the .rec file:
pestmode estimation
npar 668
relparmax 2.222
facparmax 2.222
facorig 0.001
phiredswh 0.05
noptmax 0
phiredstp 0.0075
nphistp 4
nphinored 4
relparstp 0.0075
nrelpar 4
PHIREDSWH was incorrectly set to 0.1 and NRELPAR was incorrectly set to 3. I wonder if I am entering the new enhanced format incorrectly (thus being ignored by PESTPP-GLM), or if there might be a bug? I prefer the new "enhanced format" but for now will use the "traditional PEST" format.
Thanks,
Steve
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: