You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi. This is somewhat related to #4630 which didn't seem to have got a lot of visibility.
Basically, it would be great to either have the UTM Remote App be able to connect to a Linux server running Libvirtd on Linux (or anything Libvirt in general). Reason behind it is that sometimes you need some good old x86 cruft to run as native as possible. KVM virtual machines also have a lot more capabilities than what's available on MacOS hypervisor.
As of today, there is no proper implementation of virt-manager to iOS and MacOS. Virt-manager runs but it's very janky and the very few remote clients seems to be very niche (just spice, just proxmox) don't seem to be actively maintained. UTM Remote seems like a great way to fill that gap. Of course I wouldn't expecting the VMs to be fully configurable through UTM remote.
I'm totally fine having this feature being locked behind a paid purchase.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hi. This is somewhat related to #4630 which didn't seem to have got a lot of visibility.
Basically, it would be great to either have the UTM Remote App be able to connect to a Linux server running Libvirtd on Linux (or anything Libvirt in general). Reason behind it is that sometimes you need some good old x86 cruft to run as native as possible. KVM virtual machines also have a lot more capabilities than what's available on MacOS hypervisor.
As of today, there is no proper implementation of virt-manager to iOS and MacOS. Virt-manager runs but it's very janky and the very few remote clients seems to be very niche (just spice, just proxmox) don't seem to be actively maintained. UTM Remote seems like a great way to fill that gap. Of course I wouldn't expecting the VMs to be fully configurable through UTM remote.
I'm totally fine having this feature being locked behind a paid purchase.
Thank you.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions