-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FR: Order of samples in MultiQC same as in samples #544
Comments
This does not seem to be supported by MultiQC. The general table is sorted alpabetically. Modules is currently mildly unclear how the work, possibly alphabetically, possible in order files are fed to MultiQC. So we might be able to "hack" this by feeding our files in the order we want to show them in a module |
Nope its alphabetically 😭 |
Putting a wontfix on this. If something changes in the future in the way MultiQC handles this, would be really nice to add! |
Two options:
|
It's a MultiQC internal thing, so the first option does not do anything. Yes prefixing works, but that means we would have to change a lot how we do stuff in the pipeline. Probably easier to change MultiQC source then (but at first glance, it's not that easy). |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The current semi-random ordering is ugly, and might hide obvious patterns.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: