You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Using hard demodulation we get a binary {0,1} vector. Now given that we previously punctured "erased or removed" the bits to reduce the rate say e.g from 1/2 to 3/4, and then after depuncturing, we inserted '0' at the punctured location. Now when we decode this sequence using viterbi decoder with argument hard decision and rate 1/2, the decoder will not be able to differentiate between an actual error and intentional erasure. When using soft-decision this problem can be mitigated since the '0' value of punctured location indicates LLR of 0 or total uncertainity.
I would like to know if it is possible to perform hard-decision decoding that takes this additional information of puncturing into account.
The error rate is also very high when using hard decision decoding and puncturing due to the above-mentioned reason.
Using hard demodulation we get a binary {0,1} vector. Now given that we previously punctured "erased or removed" the bits to reduce the rate say e.g from 1/2 to 3/4, and then after depuncturing, we inserted '0' at the punctured location. Now when we decode this sequence using viterbi decoder with argument hard decision and rate 1/2, the decoder will not be able to differentiate between an actual error and intentional erasure. When using soft-decision this problem can be mitigated since the '0' value of punctured location indicates LLR of 0 or total uncertainity.
I would like to know if it is possible to perform hard-decision decoding that takes this additional information of puncturing into account.
The error rate is also very high when using hard decision decoding and puncturing due to the above-mentioned reason.
Viterbi-decoder
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: