Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
Just to clarify, "volume" in this case would be a single file within the filesystem? There are currently no plans to change the direct mapping of object directly to single file. Generally to combine files into a single container, you would need to do this as a batch operation. So either on the client side before uploading, or some background task within the filesystem that looks for candidate files to combine into containers. Inline with S3 is not a very good candidate for this since each request is an individual object. So there is no opportunity within the request to combine with other incoming objects. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I understood, thank you! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Excuse me, please tell me, are there plans in the future to add the ability to store a set of objects in a single "volume" in posix mode?
The reason why I'm asking this: We have a distributed posix compatible file system acting as storage for versirtygw, and storing a large number of small objects in a "volume" would allow for more efficient use of file system resources.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions