Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for broadcast proof, broadcast group, and broadcast use #48

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 27, 2024

Conversation

utaal-b
Copy link
Contributor

@utaal-b utaal-b commented Mar 27, 2024

This syntax is being introduced in verus-lang/verus#1022

Copy link
Collaborator

@jaybosamiya jaybosamiya left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome, thanks Andrea! This looks good to me.

Minor comments:

  • An entry to the changelog is helpful to add as part of the PR itself; not terribly crucial since it can be added later on as part of the release process too
  • The extra newline at the end of a mod is not ideal, but doesn't seem to be caused by this particular PR, so I'll just open up an issue to track that it needs to be fixed (EDIT: Unnecessary newline in same-file modules #49)

@jaybosamiya jaybosamiya merged commit 1dc506c into main Mar 27, 2024
8 checks passed
@jaybosamiya jaybosamiya deleted the broadcast-proof-use branch March 27, 2024 17:44
@utaal-b
Copy link
Contributor Author

utaal-b commented Mar 27, 2024

Thanks!

An entry to the changelog is helpful to add as part of the PR itself; not terribly crucial since it can be added later on as part of the release process too

Will keep in mind for the future! Thanks for taking care of it for me this time.

... extra newline ... I'll just open up an issue to track that it needs to be fixed

Thanks for looking into it!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants