Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move rhel9.4 test to testing-farm #7545

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 29, 2024
Merged

Move rhel9.4 test to testing-farm #7545

merged 1 commit into from
May 29, 2024

Conversation

yih-redhat
Copy link
Collaborator

Currently there are still two bugs in testing-farm that block some case from success, but we can enable rhel9.4 test first.

  1. testing-farm: edge-installer-94 fail because openshift application not available #7544
  2. testing-farm: edge-8to9-94 and edge-9to9-94 can pass but testing-farm plugin reports fail #7543

@henrywang
Copy link
Contributor

@yih-redhat could you please fix commit line error? Thanks.

@yih-redhat
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@yih-redhat could you please fix commit line error? Thanks.

fixed.

update_pull_request_status: true
pull_request_status_name: "edge-commit-9.4"
tf_scope: private
tmt_plan_regex: edge-commit
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The tmt plan regex should be edge-test and use only one to run all palns in edge-test.fmf. We can't split the tests because each separated test will consume one github runner. The whole org only has 20 concurrent runner limitation.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed

test: edge-test
execute:
how: tmt
provision:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You should add required cpu and memory here.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed

endsWith(github.event.comment.body, '/test-rhel-9-4-minimal') ||
endsWith(github.event.comment.body, '/test-rhel-9-4-arm-minimal') ||
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can remove all of them and just keep /test-rhel-9-4.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed

git_url: ${{ needs.pr-info.outputs.repo_url }}
git_ref: ${{ needs.pr-info.outputs.ref }}
update_pull_request_status: true
pull_request_status_name: "edge-commit-9.4"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Status name should be like edge-rhel-9.4.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed

git_url: ${{ needs.pr-info.outputs.repo_url }}
git_ref: ${{ needs.pr-info.outputs.ref }}
update_pull_request_status: true
pull_request_status_name: "edge-vmdk-x86-rhel-94"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do not need additional jobs for vmdk, arm. Only use one workflow job and filter x86_64 or aarch64 with tmt plan.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed

@yih-redhat
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Use one runner and use matrix of arch sometimes will cause timeout issue and cannot see the sub-job status. So I changed it back to use two runners, one is for x86 and one is for aarch64.
Test ci looks good here: yih-redhat/tmt-demo#76

@yih-redhat
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@henrywang Could you please review this pr?

@henrywang henrywang merged commit 840041d into virt-s1:main May 29, 2024
4 checks passed
@yih-redhat yih-redhat deleted the enable-94-tmt branch June 18, 2024 03:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants